How can we evaluate the effectiveness of health informatics training programmes?
SSHIA and other organisations invest significant resources in health informatics training. How can we evaluate whether this training is effective and leading to improved health outcomes?
Replies 2
The Kirkpatrick model provides a useful framework for evaluating training effectiveness at four levels: Reaction (did participants find the training useful?); Learning (did participants acquire the intended knowledge and skills?); Behaviour (are participants applying what they learned in their work?); and Results (has the training led to improved health system performance or health outcomes?). Most training evaluations in South Sudan focus on the first two levels. SSHIA is working to develop evaluation approaches that assess behaviour change and results.
Longitudinal follow-up studies — where training participants are assessed 3-6 months after training to see whether they are applying their new skills — are particularly valuable for evaluating behaviour change. SSHIA conducts follow-up surveys with training participants and uses the results to improve training content and delivery. Members who have completed SSHIA training are encouraged to participate in follow-up surveys when contacted.
Related Discussions
-
How can we build a culture of data use in South Sudan health facilities?
126 2 -
What are the key competencies for health informatics leadership in South Sudan?
165 2 -
How can health informatics training be sustained beyond donor funding in South Sudan?
355 2 -
What is the role of peer learning in health informatics professional development?
335 2 -
How can health informatics training support the COVID-19 vaccination campaign in South Sudan?
226 2